The Sexual Buffet

Alright.  So here's my detailed explanation of my opposition to the idea of gay people marrying one another:

Since the 1960s and really, since the beginning, there has been a movement toward sexual libertinism.  I believe it's author is Satan.  If we look at sex as a buffet, there's only one entre on the menu and it's only available to those of us who are married.  This is God's law.  It's simple.  It's ample for our needs.

What has happened is that over time, we've become obsessed with sex.  Instead of the equivalent of 3 meals a day, we've become convinced that several dozen daily meals are necessary.  Man cannot live on sex alone.  That's why we're supposed to stick to abstinence before and fidelity after marriage: to avoid obsession.

In addition, new menu items have been added to the buffet.  The first were fornication and adultery; various other opitons are there, as well.  At this point, gay sex is there, too.  And according to groups like MBLA, (sic) kids are on the menu, too.  I won't go on because you get the picture.

So, what's a guy to do?  Having only one option is so much more boring than having several, right?  And what does it hurt?  I'm a libertarian, right?  It's none of my business.

Well, it's hurting children and by extension, society.  Here's how:  Your average person steps up to the buffet.  He notes that married sex comes with its own whole set of responsibilities and conditions, as it should.  He then notices the other options.  Maybe he selects one of those.  More and more people are doing it, right?  Well, an indisputable fact is that a married heterosexual couple is the best vehicle for the raising of kids.  And we all benefit from well-raised kids.  Kids need a mom and a dad; not some next best thing.  These truths are self-evident.

And that's why I would persuade gay people to not marry; and to cease and desist all other activities that go toward the further acceptance of their lifestyle by society.  Because with more acceptance will come more of a dearth of ideal homes for raising kids, as more people opt out of the optimal kid-raising mechanism.  And that's not good. 

It really is none of my business what you do in your bed.  But with TV shows like modern family where there it is, the oh-so-normal, funny gay family, we're all getting used to the idea.  It seems... not so bad.  What does it hurt me whatever they're doing?  Well, it doesn't hurt me, directly.  But kids need to grow up.  They need examples to follow.  They need nurturing from a mother and provision and protection from a father.  There's no substitute.  It's hard enough to grow up.  We mustn't deprive kids of what is fundamental to their growth, maturity and development into individuals of responsible character, strength and esteem.

That is my problem with the gay lifestyle juggernaut.  They're selling people on a career that takes them away from their highest and best utility while on earth:  marriage and parenthood.  Because it's not just fundamentally educational and edifying for the kids.  It's a real growth experience for the parents and spouses, as well.

And there's the rub.  Gays, if they do as I'm recommending, will miss out on being a parent and a spouse altogether.  But I believe they must do it, out of concern for kids.  Though, again, while I'm all for persuasion; I'm against govt initiative force against gays to make them do or not do what I feel is best.